Yesterday there were reports over over six waterspouts on southern Lake Michigan.
Yesterday there were reports over over six waterspouts on southern Lake Michigan.
From NWS in Joliet:
000 NOUS43 KLOT 170129 PNSLOT PUBLIC INFORMATION STATEMENT NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE CHICAGO/ROMEOVILLE IL 730 PM CDT FRI SEP 16 2011 UNSEASONABLY COOL CONDITIONS HAVE CONTINUED TODAY. THIS WAS THE SECOND TIME IN HISTORY THAT THERE WERE 3 CONSECUTIVE DAYS WITH HIGH TEMPERATURES UNDER 60 DEGREES THIS EARLY IN THE SEASON. THE HIGH TEMPERATURES FOR SEPTEMBER 14,15 AND 16 WERE 58,59, AND 60 RESPECTIVELY. THE LAST TIME THIS HAPPENED WAS BACK IN 1923. WHEN ON SEPTEMBER 13, 14, AND 15, THE HIGH TEMPERATURES WAS 56, 54, AND 59 RESPECTIVELY. $$
I published my first e-portfolio for Meteo 241 tonight. It was an interesting exercise. Particularly as we are only a couple of weeks into the course, it was challenging to write and try to sound intelligent about a topic of which I am only beginning to become familiar.
The assigment was to show our understanding of and ability to use various forms of sensing to gather information about a tropical storm. What was difficult was putting these data sources into the context of tropical weather when we haven’t learned much about tropical cyclones or how they form yet.
Hurricane Ike was one of the costliest hurricanes ever to make landfall in the United States. By some estimates it caused over $27 billion dollars in damage and 112 deaths in Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi. Ike made landfall near Galveston, TX as a Category 2 storm on September 13, 2008 (though earlier in its life it was as strong as a category 4 storm). Even the remnants of Ike were strong; one of the reasons I picked it was because of the extensive flooding caused in the Midwest, where I live.
This article will examine Ike’s intensity shortly before landfall on the Texas coast, focusing on observations made around 1200Z on September 12, 2008.
We will be examining three separate types of data, all taken from observations on September 12, 2008, at the same time around 1200Z. We will examine a Vortex data message (VDM) from a “Hurricane Hunter” flight, a multiplatform satellite surface wind analysis, and a HRD Wind Analysis, with the purpose of better understanding how these types of data allow us to determine tropical cyclone (TC) intensity.
VDMs are transmitted by Hurricane Hunter flights from the USAFR’s 53rd Weather Reconnaisance Squadron. The 53rd’s WC-130Js are tasked with flying through hurricanes such as Ike and transmitting data to the National Hurricane Center (NHC). These messages provide data on the current strength and character of the storm. In addition to data gathered from various sensors on the WC-130J, the VDM contains impressions from the flight meteorologist on board the plane, an important eyewitness and reality check to the sensor data.
On September 12, 2008, at 1142Z, a Hurricane Hunter transmitted the following VDM:
Below is an annotated VDM, interpreting each line (PDF).
Besides the obvious data points such as maximum recorded flight level winds, estimated minimum sea-level pressure and estimated surface winds, the VDM provides a number of other data points which help us analyze storm intensity. For example, item I provides the temperature outside the eye, and item J provides the temperature inside the eye.
Table of Select VDMs – Items I & J
|Date||Time||Outside Temp (I)||Inside Temp (J)||Temp Difference||Pressure (H)|
All temps in C. Data source
An eye warmer than the atmosphere surrounding it is characteristic of a strong TC, with a greater differential indicating a stronger storm. The fluctuations in the temperature differential shown above are also generally consistent with the fluctuations in the strength of Ike as it passed westward across the islands, Cuba and the Gulf towards landfall. The correlation of higher temperature to lower surface pressure, while not perfect, is there.
In summary, the VDM indicates a maximum intensity (surface wind speed) of 65 kts from Line D of the VDM. However, see the conclusion below for an important caveat.
The multiplatform satellite surface wind analysis (“multiplatform analysis”), as its name suggests, relies upon the input of several remote sensors (satellites), which are then combined into a single analysis. Below is the analysis for 1200Z on September 12, 2008, shortly after the VDM above.
The image above is built from several building blocks, including data derived from AMSU-A, data from cloud-drift winds based on IR and water vapor imagery, surface winds derived from cloud temperatures on IR imagery, and scatterometry data from the Quickscat satellite.
In particular, scatterometry data from the QuikSCAT satellite was used and its contribution can be seen here:
The convention on RAMMB-CIRA is to show data from QuikSCAT in blue. With the loss of QuikSCAT, this image (had it been of a storm today) would have no scatterometry data as no ASCAT pass appears (ASCAT is shown in red). The “black flagging” of data close to the center of the storm can be seen as well (see caption).
The approximate maximum wind shown with icons is in the range of 80-95 kts to the northeast of the center of the storm. The black isotachs are spaced at 15 kt increments. VMax is shown on the data block as 91 kts.
The third source of data we will examine is a wind analysis from the Hurricane Research Division (HRD) of NOAA. Here is the 1330Z image from September 12, 2008, approximately 90 minutes after the time of the vortex data message and multiplatform analysis discussed above.
The HRD wind analyses combine data from several sources, including ships, buoys, SFMR measurements and dropsonodes from NOAA research aircraft and USAFR C-130s, QuikScat and TRMM satellites, and GOES cloud drift winds. These analyses help bridge the gap between subjective and objective estimates of wind speed by applying objective analysis to as much data as possible.
Looking at the data source image provided by HRD, above, as well as the caption of the analysis itself, we can see that the HRD wind analysis we are looking at relied heavily on SFMR imagery from recon flights (in yellow), GPS dropsonodes (in pink/maroon and green) as well as a fortuitous moored buoy NW of the center. These may be easier to see in the 2 degree image here.
In summary, the HRD wind analysis suggests maximum surface winds of 93 kts.
The three tools we looked at suggested different maximum surface wind speeds: the vortex message suggested 65kts, the multiplatform analysis suggests 91 kts, and the HRD wind analysis suggests max wind of 93 kts. The outlier clearly is the VDM; the other two analyses are consistent with each other. The VDM and HRD analysis have the advantage of combining in-situ and remote sensing to corroborate data. Why is the VDM so far “off” of the other two data sources?
To explain this anomaly, we can look to the other VDMs from approximately the same time and mission. VDMs from the same flight (AF301) show estimated max wind speeds (item D, the inflight meteorologists’ estimate of surface wind speed) of 88kts at 1326Z, 81 kts at 1505Z, and 63 kts at 1721Z. The subsequent flight (AF304) showed speeds varying 76-89kts from 2038Z to 0235Z the next day. The 65kts of my chosen VDM seems to be an outlier, while the majority of the other observations around a similar time clump in the mid-80s. When plotted on the HRD wind map (below), the fix for the VDM shows as being well south of the area of maximum wind, thus leading to the lower wind speed estimate. This shows why it is important to use as much data as is available, including remote sources and in-situ ones; had we relied only on the one VDM, we would have gotten an erroneous estimate of intensity.
The maximum surface wind is somewhere in the range of 88-93 kts at 1200Z on September 12. This compares favorably with the 90kts given in Table 1 of Ike’s Tropical Cyclone Report.
Mark Thornton has written up a very good and detailed analysis of the storm that hit the 103rd running of the Chicago Yacht Club Race to Mackinac. Mark is a sailor and a graduate of the Penn State Certificate in Weather Forecasting program in which I am enrolled.
His analysis can be found here. It is a worthwhile read, especially for those of you (like myself) that weathered the storm this July.